netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/3] PM: Renesas: Remove dummy runtime PM callbacks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181025002028.GA971@kunai>
Date:   Thu, 25 Oct 2018 01:20:28 +0100
From:   Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To:     Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
        linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
        Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] PM: Renesas: Remove dummy runtime PM callbacks


> At least the I2C driver part of this was on my todo list as well (just a
> bit lower :/). I wanted to find out why they have been there in the
> first place. Do you know if such callbacks were needed "back in the
> days"?

I see now that you referenced the relevant commits in the patch
descriptions. Thanks!


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)