netdev - checksumming on non-local forward path

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHmME9rMhHwyiw0t+0oGS6XwPkmrbG_8TPmtWdS3aW9AFByphg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 27 Oct 2018 02:58:50 +0200
From:   "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
To:     Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: checksumming on non-local forward path

Hey netdev,

In a protocol like wireguard, if a packet arrives on the other end of
the tunnel, and the crypto checks out, then we're absolutely certain
that the packet hasn't been modified in transit. In this case, there's
no useful information that validating the inner checksums of the
various headers would give us. Every byte of the packet has arrived
intact, and we're certain of it.

Therefore, you might think in a situation like this, before calling
netif_receive_skb or the like, we can just set ip_summed to
CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY, csum_level to ~0, and feel glad that we're not
wasting cycles unnecessarily validating the checksum.

But what if the receiving computer forwards the packet on across a
real physical network? In that case, it's probably important that the
kernel that originally produced the packet in the first place ensures
it has a valid checksum before encrypting it and sending it through
the wireguard tunnel. That's fine, but it does mean that in the case
of the packet being locally received on the other end, and not
forwarded, the checksumming by the original sender was not needed and
was therefore wasteful.

What would you think of a flag on the receiving end like,
"CHECKSUM_INVALID_BUT_UNNECESSARY"? It would be treated as
CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY in the case that the the packet is locally
received. But if the packet is going to be forwarded instead, then
skb_checksum_help is called on it before forwarding onward.

AFAICT, wireguard isn't the only thing that could benefit from this:
virtio is another case where it's not always necessary for the sender
to call skb_checksum_help, when the receiver could just do it
conditionally based on whether it's being forwarded.

Thoughts?

Regards,
Jason