[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM_iQpXS2zp-_6XEmzyfvenomDmHqR3uJWoSiMSJG71OKZ3Sjg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2018 11:09:21 -0700
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>, eranbe@...lanox.com,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>, dmichail@...gle.com,
Paweł Staszewski <pstaszewski@...are.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net/mlx5e: fix csum adjustments caused by RXFCS
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 12:57 AM Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> wrote:
> -static __be32 mlx5e_get_fcs(struct sk_buff *skb)
> +static u32 mlx5e_get_fcs(const struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
> - int last_frag_sz, bytes_in_prev, nr_frags;
> - u8 *fcs_p1, *fcs_p2;
> - skb_frag_t *last_frag;
> - __be32 fcs_bytes;
> + const void *fcs_bytes;
> + u32 _fcs_bytes;
>
> - if (!skb_is_nonlinear(skb))
> - return *(__be32 *)(skb->data + skb->len - ETH_FCS_LEN);
> + fcs_bytes = skb_header_pointer(skb, skb->len - ETH_FCS_LEN,
> + ETH_FCS_LEN, &_fcs_bytes);
At least skb_header_pointer() is marked as __must_check, I don't see
you check its return value here.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists