[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANn89iLACBMgvACD=4hMBRMD43HPH9rCwqe=Mii6CQV89v9Mdg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2018 12:03:26 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Eran Ben Elisha <eranbe@...lanox.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
Dimitris Michailidis <dmichail@...gle.com>,
Paweł Staszewski <pstaszewski@...are.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net/mlx5e: fix csum adjustments caused by RXFCS
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 11:59 AM Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com> wrote:
> I wonder how compiler recognizes it as "never fail" when marked with
> __must_check.
__must_check means that you can not ignore the return value of a function.
Here we do use the return value.
Also prior code was not checking skb->length so really my patch does
add explicit
check if in the future skb->len gets wrong after a bug is added in this driver.
(A NULL deref will trap the bug, instead of potentially reading
garbage from skb->data)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists