lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 30 Oct 2018 12:04:13 +0100
From:   Andre Tomt <andre@...t.net>
To:     Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc:     Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, rossi.f@...ind.it,
        Dimitris Michailidis <dmichail@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: Fw: [Bug 201423] New: eth0: hw csum failure

On 30.10.2018 11:58, Andre Tomt wrote:
> On 27.10.2018 23:41, Andre Tomt wrote:
>> On 26.10.2018 13:45, Andre Tomt wrote:
>>> On 25.10.2018 19:38, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 10/24/2018 12:41 PM, Andre Tomt wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> It eventually showed up again with mlx4, on 4.18.16 + fix and also 
>>>>> on 4.19. I still do not have a useful packet capture.
>>>>>
>>>>> It is running a torrent client serving up various linux distributions.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Have you also applied this fix ?
>>>>
>>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net.git/commit/?id=db4f1be3ca9b0ef7330763d07bf4ace83ad6f913 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> No. I've applied it now to 4.19 and will report back if anything 
>>> shows up.
>>
>> Just hit it on the simpler server; no VRF, no tunnels, no 
>> nat/conntrack. Only a basic stateless nftables ruleset and a vlan 
>> netdev (unlikely to be the one triggering this I guess; it has only v4 
>> traffic).
> 
> I'm currently testing 4.19 with the recomended commit added, plus these 
> to sort out some GRO issues (on a hunch, unsure if related):
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net.git/commit/?id=a8305bff685252e80b7c60f4f5e7dd2e63e38218 
> 
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net.git/commit/?id=992cba7e276d438ac8b0a8c17b147b37c8c286f7 
> 
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net.git/commit/?id=ece23711dd956cd5053c9cb03e9fe0668f9c8894 
> 
> 
> and I *think* it is behaving better now? it's not conclusive as it could 
> take a while to trip in this environment but some of the test servers 
> have not shown anything bad in almost 24h.

Sorry, s/some of the/none of the

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ