netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/2] net: xlinx: mdio: recheck condition after timeout

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181030134704.l673d7pm5mwysx2o@linutronix.de>
Date:   Tue, 30 Oct 2018 14:47:04 +0100
From:   Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt.kanzenbach@...utronix.de>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     Anirudha Sarangi <anirudh@...inx.com>,
        John Linn <John.Linn@...inx.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
        Radhey Shyam Pandey <radhey.shyam.pandey@...inx.com>,
        YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] net: xlinx: mdio: recheck condition after timeout

Hi Andrew,

On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 01:08:31PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 10:31:37AM +0100, Kurt Kanzenbach wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > the Xilinx mdio wait functions may return false positives under certain
> > circumstances: If the functions get preempted between reading the corresponding
> > mdio register and checking for the timeout, they could falsely indicate a
> > timeout.
>
> Hi Kurt
>
> I wonder if it would be possible to add a readx_poll_timeout() which
> passes two parameters to op()?

actually I was thinking about using readx_poll_timeout(). But as you
already pointed out, it expects only one parameter for op(). I'm not
sure about adding a new readx_poll_timeout() macro.

>
> I keep seeing this basic problem in various drivers, and try to point
> people towards readx_poll_timeout(), but it is not the best of fit.
>
> Otherwise, could you add a axienet_ior_read_mcr(lp), and use
> readx_poll_timeout() as is?

I guess that would work.

I'll use readx_poll_timeout() for both wait functions and send a v2.

Thanks,
Kurt