[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20181106.144114.1805194057718658471.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2018 14:41:14 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: edumazet@...gle.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ipv6: gro: do not use slow memcmp() in
ipv6_gro_receive()
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2018 14:25:52 -0800
> + if (unlikely(nlen > sizeof(struct ipv6hdr))) {
> + if (memcmp(iph + 1, iph2 + 1,
> + nlen - sizeof(struct ipv6hdr)))
> + goto not_same_flow;
> + }
Is this even possible?
off = skb_gro_offset(skb);
hlen = off + sizeof(*iph);
iph = skb_gro_header_fast(skb, off);
off is some offset to the ipv6hdr in skb. This is GRO's CB data_offset.
skb_set_network_header(skb, off);
skb_gro_pull(skb, sizeof(*iph));
skb_set_transport_header(skb, skb_gro_offset(skb));
Set network header to location of iph in SKB.
GRO pull causes an incremebt of data_offset by sizeof(*iph) bytes.
Set transport header to new data_offset value.
nlen = skb_network_header_len(skb);
This is transport_header - network_header.
>From what I can see, it is impossible for this to take on any value
other than sizeof(*ipv6hdr).
If you agree, please let's get rid of nlen and this useless code, and
replace with sizeof(*ipv6hdr) as needed.
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists