[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <560b2828-cb1b-5ab5-f98b-b042a7e483f8@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2018 07:16:18 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] tcp: minor optimization in tcp ack fast path
processing
On 11/07/2018 03:20 AM, Yafang Shao wrote:
> Bitwise operation is a little faster.
> So I replace after() with (flag & FLAG_SND_UNA_ADVANCED) as this flag is
> already set before.
>
> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>
> ---
> net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
> index 2868ef2..0167015 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
> @@ -3610,7 +3610,7 @@ static int tcp_ack(struct sock *sk, const struct sk_buff *skb, int flag)
> if (flag & FLAG_UPDATE_TS_RECENT)
> tcp_replace_ts_recent(tp, TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq);
>
> - if (!(flag & FLAG_SLOWPATH) && after(ack, prior_snd_una)) {
> + if (!(flag & FLAG_SLOWPATH) && (flag & FLAG_SND_UNA_ADVANCED)) {
> /* Window is constant, pure forward advance.
> * No more checks are required.
> * Note, we use the fact that SND.UNA>=SND.WL2.
>
What about reducing this to a single conditional jump ?
if ((flag & (FLAG_SLOWPATH | FLAG_SND_UNA_ADVANCED)) == FLAG_SND_UNA_ADVANCED) {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists