[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20181107224830.9737-2-jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2018 14:48:19 -0800
From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
To: davem@...emloft.net
Cc: Lance Roy <ldr709@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
nhorman@...hat.com, sassmann@...hat.com,
Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
Subject: [net-next 01/12] igbvf: Replace spin_is_locked() with lockdep
From: Lance Roy <ldr709@...il.com>
lockdep_assert_held() is better suited to checking locking requirements,
since it won't get confused when someone else holds the lock. This is
also a step towards possibly removing spin_is_locked().
Signed-off-by: Lance Roy <ldr709@...il.com>
Tested-by: Aaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/mbx.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/mbx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/mbx.c
index 163e5838f7c2..a3cd7ac48d4b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/mbx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/mbx.c
@@ -241,7 +241,7 @@ static s32 e1000_write_mbx_vf(struct e1000_hw *hw, u32 *msg, u16 size)
s32 err;
u16 i;
- WARN_ON_ONCE(!spin_is_locked(&hw->mbx_lock));
+ lockdep_assert_held(&hw->mbx_lock);
/* lock the mailbox to prevent pf/vf race condition */
err = e1000_obtain_mbx_lock_vf(hw);
@@ -279,7 +279,7 @@ static s32 e1000_read_mbx_vf(struct e1000_hw *hw, u32 *msg, u16 size)
s32 err;
u16 i;
- WARN_ON_ONCE(!spin_is_locked(&hw->mbx_lock));
+ lockdep_assert_held(&hw->mbx_lock);
/* lock the mailbox to prevent pf/vf race condition */
err = e1000_obtain_mbx_lock_vf(hw);
--
2.19.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists