[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <96112482-1293-0276-8bcc-44bf1beabd59@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 14:33:37 -0800
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] net: phy: replace PHY_HAS_INTERRUPT with a
check for config_intr and ack_interrupt
On 11/8/18 1:55 PM, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> Flag PHY_HAS_INTERRUPT is used only here for this small check. I think
> using interrupts isn't possible if a driver defines neither
> config_intr nor ack_interrupts callback. So we can replace checking
> flag PHY_HAS_INTERRUPT with checking for these callbacks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
> index d165a2c82..33e51b955 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
> @@ -2104,8 +2104,9 @@ static int phy_probe(struct device *dev)
> /* Disable the interrupt if the PHY doesn't support it
> * but the interrupt is still a valid one
> */
> - if (!(phydrv->flags & PHY_HAS_INTERRUPT) &&
> - phy_interrupt_is_valid(phydev))
> + if (!phydrv->config_intr &&
> + !phydrv->ack_interrupt &&
> + phy_interrupt_is_valid(phydev))
> phydev->irq = PHY_POLL;
I would introduce an inline helper function which checks for
drv->config_intr and config_ack_interrupt, that way if we ever have to
introduce an additional function in the future, we just update the
helper to check for that.
Other than that, LGTM
--
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists