lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 7 Nov 2018 21:59:02 -0800
From:   Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:     David Barmann <david.barmann@...ckpath.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] sock: Reset dst when changing sk_mark via
 setsockopt



On 11/07/2018 08:55 PM, David Barmann wrote:
> When setting the SO_MARK socket option, the dst needs to be reset so
> that a new route lookup is performed.
> 
> This fixes the case where an application wants to change routing by
> setting a new sk_mark.  If this is done after some packets have already
> been sent, the dst is cached and has no effect.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Barmann <david.barmann@...ckpath.com>
> ---
>  net/core/sock.c | 6 ++++--
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
> index 7b304e454a38..c74b10be86cb 100644
> --- a/net/core/sock.c
> +++ b/net/core/sock.c
> @@ -952,10 +952,12 @@ int sock_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
>  			clear_bit(SOCK_PASSSEC, &sock->flags);
>  		break;
>  	case SO_MARK:
> -		if (!ns_capable(sock_net(sk)->user_ns, CAP_NET_ADMIN))
> +		if (!ns_capable(sock_net(sk)->user_ns, CAP_NET_ADMIN)) {
>  			ret = -EPERM;
> -		else
> +		} else {
>  			sk->sk_mark = val;
> +			sk_dst_reset(sk);


There is no need to force a sk_dst_reset(sk) if sk_mark was not changed.

I already gave you this feedback, please do not ignore it.

Thanks.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ