netdev - Re: [RFC perf,bpf 1/5] perf, bpf: Introduce PERF_RECORD_BPF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 9 Nov 2018 10:08:07 -0700
From:   David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To:     Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Kernel Team <Kernel-team@...com>,
        "ast@...nel.org" <ast@...nel.org>,
        "daniel@...earbox.net" <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        "acme@...nel.org" <acme@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC perf,bpf 1/5] perf, bpf: Introduce PERF_RECORD_BPF_EVENT

On 11/8/18 11:49 AM, Song Liu wrote:
> Could you please point me to more information about the use cases you worry 
> about? I am more than happy to optimize the logic for those use cases. 

bpf load and unload as just another tracepoint to throw into a set of
events that are monitored. As mentioned before auditing the loads and
unloads is one example.

And that brings up another comment: Why are you adding a PERF_RECORD_*
rather than a tracepoint? From what I can see the PERF_RECORD_BPF_EVENT
definition does not include the who is loading / unloading a bpf
program. That is important information as well.