lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181108193712.754659d7@cakuba.netronome.com>
Date:   Thu, 8 Nov 2018 19:38:56 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
To:     Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, shuah@...nel.org,
        quentin.monnet@...ronome.com, guro@...com,
        jiong.wang@...ronome.com, sdf@...gle.com,
        bhole_prashant_q7@....ntt.co.jp, john.fastabend@...il.com,
        jbenc@...hat.com, treeze.taeung@...il.com, yhs@...com, osk@...com,
        sandipan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 bpf-next 4/7] libbpf: add internal pin_name

On Thu,  8 Nov 2018 16:22:10 -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> @@ -261,6 +266,18 @@ static void bpf_program__exit(struct bpf_program *prog)
>  	prog->idx = -1;
>  }
>  
> +static char *__bpf_program__pin_name(struct bpf_program *prog)
> +{
> +	char *name;
> +
> +	name = strdup(prog->section_name);
> +	for (char *p = name; p && *p; p++)

Useful patch!  I'm not sure about libbpf but in the kernel we don't do
C99 variable declarations inside for loop init.  Perhaps better to stick
to kernel rules than invent our own.

Also, I'm tempted to say:

	char *name, *p;

	name = p = strdup(prog->section_name);
	while ((p = strchr(p, '/')))
		*p = '_';

;)

> +		if (*p == '/')
> +			*p = '_';
> +
> +	return name;
> +}

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ