netdev - Re: [PATCH 00/20] octeontx2-af: NPC MCAM support and FLR handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+sq2Cf2w1S8Gg+g0DhPU+TCf74U+MHMMWjZvePvAW9wTCNUag@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 9 Nov 2018 10:04:56 +0530
From:   Sunil Kovvuri <sunil.kovvuri@...il.com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        Sunil Goutham <sgoutham@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/20] octeontx2-af: NPC MCAM support and FLR handling

On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 2:32 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 7:36 PM <sunil.kovvuri@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Sunil Goutham <sgoutham@...vell.com>
>
> Hmm, I noticed that you use a different address as the patch author
> and the submitter. I'm guessing that "Sunil Goutham" and
> "Sunil Kovvuri" actually refer to the same person, and you just
> need to pick which of the two email addresses you want to use
> for public communication, but that's not obvious here.
>
> However, if there are actually two different Sunil's here, then
> you need to add that second Signed-off-by.
>

No, it's just me.
Sometimes code indentation becomes messy and difficult to read, if i use
corporate mail server to submit patches. So i have been using gmail.

> I've taken a look at all the patches now, and found very little
> sticking out that warranted a comment from my side, and
> no real show-stoppers. That said, I found this series overall
> much harder to understand than the previous ones, and don't
> even know what to ask about it. My feeling is that it's probably
> all fine, but that is  purely based on a review  of the individual
> pieces, not the overall design and how they fit together. With the
> earlier patches that I managed to get a better understanding
> of, that seemed reasonable as well.
>
>       Arnd