netdev - Re: Kernel 4.19 network performance - forwarding/routing normal users traffic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <78c37b54-dfd8-d528-1152-abe9ddbb08b2@itcare.pl>
Date:   Sat, 10 Nov 2018 22:53:53 +0100
From:   Paweł Staszewski <pstaszewski@...are.pl>
To:     Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
Cc:     Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Kernel 4.19 network performance - forwarding/routing normal users
 traffic



W dniu 10.11.2018 o 22:01, Jesper Dangaard Brouer pisze:
> On Sat, 10 Nov 2018 21:02:10 +0100
> Paweł Staszewski <pstaszewski@...are.pl> wrote:
>
>> W dniu 10.11.2018 o 20:34, Jesper Dangaard Brouer pisze:
>>> I want you to experiment with:
>>>
>>>    ethtool --set-priv-flags DEVICE rx_striding_rq off
>> just checked that previously connectx4 was have thos disabled:
>>    ethtool --show-priv-flags enp175s0f0
>>
>> Private flags for enp175s0f0:
>> rx_cqe_moder       : on
>> tx_cqe_moder       : off
>> rx_cqe_compress    : off
>> rx_striding_rq     : off
>> rx_no_csum_complete: off
>>
> The CX4 hardware does not have this feature (p.s. the CX4-Lx does).
>
>   
>> So now we are on connectx5 and we have enabled - for sure connectx5
>> changed cpu load - where i have now max 50/60% cpu where with connectx4
>> there was sometimes near 100% with same configuration.
> I (strongly) believe the CPU load was related to the page-alloactor
> lock congestion, that Aaron fixed.
>
Yes i think both - most problems with cpu was due to page-allocator 
problems.
But also after change connctx4 to connectx5 there is cpu load difference 
- about 10% in total - but yes most of this like 40% is cause of Aaron 
patch :) - rly good job :)


Now im messing with ring configuration for connectx5 nics.
And after reading that paper:
https://netdevconf.org/2.1/slides/apr6/network-performance/ 
04-amir-RX_and_TX_bulking_v2.pdf

changed from RX:8192 / TX: 4096 to RX:8192 / TX: 256

after this i gain about 5Gbit/s RX and TX traffic and less cpu load....
before change there was 59/59 Gbit/s

After change there is 64/64 Gbit/s

  bwm-ng v0.6.1 (probing every 1.000s), press 'h' for help
   input: /proc/net/dev type: rate
   |         iface                   Rx Tx                Total
==============================================================================
          enp175s0:          44.45 Gb/s           19.69 Gb/s           
64.14 Gb/s
          enp216s0:          19.69 Gb/s           44.49 Gb/s           
64.19 Gb/s
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             total:          64.14 Gb/s           64.18 Gb/s 128.33 Gb/s