[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2018 10:23:47 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: hkallweit1@...il.com
Cc: bhelgaas@...gle.com, isdn@...ux-pingi.de, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] PCI: add USR vendor id and use it in r8169
and w6692 driver
From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2018 11:50:08 +0100
> diff --git a/include/linux/pci_ids.h b/include/linux/pci_ids.h
> index 69f0abe1b..1fac231fe 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pci_ids.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pci_ids.h
> @@ -2359,6 +2359,10 @@
>
> #define PCI_VENDOR_ID_SYNOPSYS 0x16c3
>
> +#define PCI_VENDOR_ID_USR 0x16ec
> +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_USR_997902 0x0116
> +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_USR_6692 0x3409
> +
> #define PCI_VENDOR_ID_VITESSE 0x1725
> #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_VITESSE_VSC7174 0x7174
Generally, as I understand the policy for linux/pci_ids.h, we only add
things used in multiple locations.
So PCI_VENDOR_ID_USR is OK, since it is used in both r8169 and w6692.
But the device IDs are not, since only w6692 uses them.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists