| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 20:05:41 +0000
From: Martin Lau <kafai@...com>
To: Matt Mullins <mmullins@...com>
CC: "ast@...nel.org" <ast@...nel.org>,
"daniel@...earbox.net" <daniel@...earbox.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Team <Kernel-team@...com>, Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>,
"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: support raw tracepoints in modules
On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 02:06:32PM -0800, Matt Mullins wrote:
> Distributions build drivers as modules, including network and filesystem
> drivers which export numerous tracepoints. This enables
> bpf(BPF_RAW_TRACEPOINT_OPEN) to attach to those tracepoints.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matt Mullins <mmullins@...com>
> ---
> My apologies if this got duplicated to some of the recipients; I think I have
> SMTP working now.
>
> include/linux/module.h | 4 ++
> include/linux/trace_events.h | 8 ++-
> kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 11 +++--
> kernel/module.c | 5 ++
> kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 96 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 5 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/module.h b/include/linux/module.h
> index fce6b4335e36..5f147dd5e709 100644
> --- a/include/linux/module.h
> +++ b/include/linux/module.h
> @@ -432,6 +432,10 @@ struct module {
> unsigned int num_tracepoints;
> tracepoint_ptr_t *tracepoints_ptrs;
> #endif
> +#ifdef CONFIG_BPF_EVENTS
> + unsigned int num_bpf_raw_events;
> + struct bpf_raw_event_map *bpf_raw_events;
> +#endif
> #ifdef HAVE_JUMP_LABEL
> struct jump_entry *jump_entries;
> unsigned int num_jump_entries;
> diff --git a/include/linux/trace_events.h b/include/linux/trace_events.h
> index 4130a5497d40..8a62731673f7 100644
> --- a/include/linux/trace_events.h
> +++ b/include/linux/trace_events.h
> @@ -471,7 +471,8 @@ void perf_event_detach_bpf_prog(struct perf_event *event);
> int perf_event_query_prog_array(struct perf_event *event, void __user *info);
> int bpf_probe_register(struct bpf_raw_event_map *btp, struct bpf_prog *prog);
> int bpf_probe_unregister(struct bpf_raw_event_map *btp, struct bpf_prog *prog);
> -struct bpf_raw_event_map *bpf_find_raw_tracepoint(const char *name);
> +struct bpf_raw_event_map *bpf_get_raw_tracepoint(const char *name);
> +void bpf_put_raw_tracepoint(struct bpf_raw_event_map *btp);
> int bpf_get_perf_event_info(const struct perf_event *event, u32 *prog_id,
> u32 *fd_type, const char **buf,
> u64 *probe_offset, u64 *probe_addr);
> @@ -502,10 +503,13 @@ static inline int bpf_probe_unregister(struct bpf_raw_event_map *btp, struct bpf
> {
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> }
> -static inline struct bpf_raw_event_map *bpf_find_raw_tracepoint(const char *name)
> +static inline struct bpf_raw_event_map *bpf_get_raw_tracepoint(const char *name)
> {
> return NULL;
> }
> +static inline void bpf_put_raw_tracepoint(struct bpf_raw_event_map *btp)
> +{
> +}
> static inline int bpf_get_perf_event_info(const struct perf_event *event,
> u32 *prog_id, u32 *fd_type,
> const char **buf, u64 *probe_offset,
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> index cf5040fd5434..c447aa1ce770 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> @@ -1597,6 +1597,7 @@ static int bpf_raw_tracepoint_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
> bpf_probe_unregister(raw_tp->btp, raw_tp->prog);
> bpf_prog_put(raw_tp->prog);
> }
> + bpf_put_raw_tracepoint(raw_tp->btp);
> kfree(raw_tp);
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -1622,13 +1623,15 @@ static int bpf_raw_tracepoint_open(const union bpf_attr *attr)
> return -EFAULT;
> tp_name[sizeof(tp_name) - 1] = 0;
>
> - btp = bpf_find_raw_tracepoint(tp_name);
> + btp = bpf_get_raw_tracepoint(tp_name);
> if (!btp)
> return -ENOENT;
>
> raw_tp = kzalloc(sizeof(*raw_tp), GFP_USER);
> - if (!raw_tp)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> + if (!raw_tp) {
> + err = -ENOMEM;
> + goto out_put_btp;
> + }
> raw_tp->btp = btp;
>
> prog = bpf_prog_get_type(attr->raw_tracepoint.prog_fd,
> @@ -1656,6 +1659,8 @@ static int bpf_raw_tracepoint_open(const union bpf_attr *attr)
> bpf_prog_put(prog);
> out_free_tp:
> kfree(raw_tp);
> +out_put_btp:
> + bpf_put_raw_tracepoint(btp);
> return err;
> }
>
> diff --git a/kernel/module.c b/kernel/module.c
> index 49a405891587..06ec68f08387 100644
> --- a/kernel/module.c
> +++ b/kernel/module.c
> @@ -3093,6 +3093,11 @@ static int find_module_sections(struct module *mod, struct load_info *info)
> sizeof(*mod->tracepoints_ptrs),
> &mod->num_tracepoints);
> #endif
> +#ifdef CONFIG_BPF_EVENTS
> + mod->bpf_raw_events = section_objs(info, "__bpf_raw_tp_map",
> + sizeof(*mod->bpf_raw_events),
> + &mod->num_bpf_raw_events);
> +#endif
> #ifdef HAVE_JUMP_LABEL
> mod->jump_entries = section_objs(info, "__jump_table",
> sizeof(*mod->jump_entries),
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> index 08fcfe440c63..a12d28c123eb 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> @@ -17,6 +17,43 @@
> #include "trace_probe.h"
> #include "trace.h"
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MODULES
> +struct bpf_trace_module {
> + struct module *module;
> + struct list_head list;
> +};
> +
> +static LIST_HEAD(bpf_trace_modules);
> +static DEFINE_MUTEX(bpf_module_mutex);
> +
> +static struct bpf_raw_event_map *bpf_get_raw_tracepoint_module(const char *name)
> +{
> + struct bpf_raw_event_map *btp, *ret = NULL;
> + struct bpf_trace_module *btm;
> + unsigned int i;
> +
Nit. May be check for list_empty() first before taking mutex?
> + mutex_lock(&bpf_module_mutex);
> + list_for_each_entry(btm, &bpf_trace_modules, list) {
> + for (i = 0; i < btm->module->num_bpf_raw_events; ++i) {
> + btp = &btm->module->bpf_raw_events[i];
> + if (!strcmp(btp->tp->name, name)) {
> + if (try_module_get(btm->module))
> + ret = btp;
> + goto out;
> + }
> + }
> + }
> +out:
> + mutex_unlock(&bpf_module_mutex);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +#else
> +static struct bpf_raw_event_map *bpf_get_raw_tracepoint_module(const char *name)
> +{
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +#endif /* CONFIG_MODULES */
> +
> u64 bpf_get_stackid(u64 r1, u64 r2, u64 r3, u64 r4, u64 r5);
> u64 bpf_get_stack(u64 r1, u64 r2, u64 r3, u64 r4, u64 r5);
>
> @@ -1074,7 +1111,7 @@ int perf_event_query_prog_array(struct perf_event *event, void __user *info)
> extern struct bpf_raw_event_map __start__bpf_raw_tp[];
> extern struct bpf_raw_event_map __stop__bpf_raw_tp[];
>
> -struct bpf_raw_event_map *bpf_find_raw_tracepoint(const char *name)
> +struct bpf_raw_event_map *bpf_get_raw_tracepoint(const char *name)
> {
> struct bpf_raw_event_map *btp = __start__bpf_raw_tp;
>
> @@ -1082,7 +1119,16 @@ struct bpf_raw_event_map *bpf_find_raw_tracepoint(const char *name)
> if (!strcmp(btp->tp->name, name))
> return btp;
> }
> - return NULL;
> +
> + return bpf_get_raw_tracepoint_module(name);
> +}
> +
> +void bpf_put_raw_tracepoint(struct bpf_raw_event_map *btp)
> +{
> + struct module *mod = __module_address((unsigned long)btp);
> +
> + if (mod)
> + module_put(mod);
> }
>
> static __always_inline
> @@ -1220,3 +1266,49 @@ int bpf_get_perf_event_info(const struct perf_event *event, u32 *prog_id,
>
> return err;
> }
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MODULES
> +int bpf_event_notify(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long op, void *module)
> +{
> + struct bpf_trace_module *btm, *tmp;
> + struct module *mod = module;
> +
> + if (mod->num_bpf_raw_events == 0)
Also check for MODULE_STATE_GOING and MODULE_STATE_COMING
before taking the mutex.
> + return 0;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&bpf_module_mutex);
> +
> + switch (op) {
> + case MODULE_STATE_COMING:
> + btm = kzalloc(sizeof(*btm), GFP_KERNEL);
Check for !btm.
> + btm->module = module;
> + list_add(&btm->list, &bpf_trace_modules);
> + break;
> + case MODULE_STATE_GOING:
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(btm, tmp, &bpf_trace_modules, list) {
Is the "_safe" version needed?
> + if (btm->module == module) {
> + list_del(&btm->list);
> + kfree(btm);
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + mutex_unlock(&bpf_module_mutex);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct notifier_block bpf_module_nb = {
> + .notifier_call = bpf_event_notify,
> +};
> +
> +int __init bpf_event_init(void)
> +{
> + register_module_notifier(&bpf_module_nb);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +fs_initcall(bpf_event_init);
> +#endif /* CONFIG_MODULES */
> --
> 2.17.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists