[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181111201332.6821bfe1@cakuba.netronome.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2018 20:13:32 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, gerlitz.or@...il.com
Cc: oss-drivers@...ronome.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
jiri@...nulli.us, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, jhs@...atatu.com,
ozsh@...lanox.com, vladbu@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/6] net: sched: indirect tc block cb
registration
On Sun, 11 Nov 2018 09:55:35 -0800 (PST), David Miller wrote:
> From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
> Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2018 21:21:25 -0800
>
> > John says:
> >
> > This patchset introduces an alternative to egdev offload by allowing a
> > driver to register for block updates when an external device (e.g. tunnel
> > netdev) is bound to a TC block. Drivers can track new netdevs or register
> > to existing ones to receive information on such events. Based on this,
> > they may register for block offload rules using already existing
> > functions.
> >
> > The patchset also implements this new indirect block registration in the
> > NFP driver to allow the offloading of tunnel rules. The use of egdev
> > offload (which is currently only used for tunnel offload) is subsequently
> > removed.
>
> Really nice. Series applied.
>
> Can the Mellanox folks use this too so that we can remove egdev altogether?
> mlx5 is the only remaining user.
I believe Or and Oz are working on mlx5 counterpart, hopefully to land
in this cycle? :)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists