[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2AD939572F25A448A3AE3CAEA61328C237AEA052@BC-MAIL-M30.internal.baidu.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 05:46:56 +0000
From: "Li,Rongqing" <lirongqing@...du.com>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
Subject: 答复: [PATCH][RFC] udp: cache sock to avoid searching it twice
> > return pp;
> > }
>
> What if 'pp' is NULL?
>
> Aside from that, this replace a lookup with 2 atomic ops, and only when
> such lookup is amortized on multiple aggregated packets: I'm unsure if
> it's worthy and I don't understand how that improves RR tests (where
> the socket can't see multiple, consecutive skbs, AFAIK).
>
> Cheers,
>
> Paolo
>
If we not release the socket in udp_gro_complete , we can reduce a udp socket
Lookup when do ip demux again, it maybe more worthy.
I test UDP_STREAM, find no difference, both can reach NIC's limit, 10G;
so Test RR, I will do more tests
-RongQing
Powered by blists - more mailing lists