netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v6 23/23] net: WireGuard secure network tunnel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHmME9rOhBwsGhFXP8qmfX-0XooJ+CLekLZ7+mNpy3kw9oq0jQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 12 Nov 2018 19:13:13 -0500
From:   "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
To:     Dave Taht <dave.taht@...il.com>
Cc:     labokml@...o.rs, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 23/23] net: WireGuard secure network tunnel

On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 7:10 PM Dave Taht <dave.taht@...il.com> wrote:
> you have a speling error (ECM). :)

Thanks.

>
> side note:
>
> I have to say that wireguard works really well with ecn and non-ecn marked flows
> against codel and fq_codel on the bottleneck router.

Yup!

> I'd still rather like it if wireguard focused a bit more on
> interleaving multiple flows better
> rather than on single stream benchmarks, one day.

We're working on it, actually. Toke has been running some tests on
some beefy 100gbps hardware he recently acquired, and after v1 lands
we'll probably have a few interesting ideas for this.

Jason