netdev - Re: [RFC v1 1/3] udp_tunnel: add config option to bind to a device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 14 Nov 2018 18:22:17 +0100
From:   Alexis Bauvin <abauvin@...leway.com>
To:     nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com, dsa@...ulusnetworks.com,
        roopa@...ulusnetworks.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, akherbouche@...leway.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v1 1/3] udp_tunnel: add config option to bind to a device

Le 14 nov. 2018 à 17:07, Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com> a écrit :
> Le 14/11/2018 à 10:31, Alexis Bauvin a écrit :
>> UDP tunnel sockets are always opened unbound to a specific device. This
>> patch allow the socket to be bound on a custom device, which
>> incidentally makes UDP tunnels VRF-aware if binding to an l3mdev.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Alexis Bauvin <abauvin@...leway.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Amine Kherbouche <akherbouche@...leway.com>
>> Tested-by: Amine Kherbouche <akherbouche@...leway.com>
> What is the difference with the previous version?
> Maybe a cover letter would help to track the history.
Unless a mistake from my side, you should have received the cover letter in
the previous email. The previous version had a typo in the commit log of the
third patch of this patch set.

> Regards,
> Nicolas
Regards,
Alexis