[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181115015547-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 15 Nov 2018 02:04:52 -0500
From:   "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To:     jiangyiwen <jiangyiwen@...wei.com>
Cc:     stefanha@...hat.com, stefanha@...il.com,
        Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Discuss about an new idea "Vsock over Virtio-net"
On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 11:56:03AM +0800, jiangyiwen wrote:
> Hi Stefan, Michael, Jason and everyone,
> 
> Several days ago, I discussed with jason about "Vsock over Virtio-net".
> This idea has two advantages:
> First, it can use many great features of virtio-net, like batching,
> mergeable rx buffer and multiqueue, etc.
> Second, it can reduce many duplicate codes and make it easy to be
> maintained.
I'm not sure I get the motivation. Which features of
virtio net are relevant to vsock? The ones that you mention
all seem to be mostly of use to the networking stack.
> Before the implement, I want to discuss with everyone again, and
> want to know everyone's suggestions.
> 
> After the discussion, based on this point I will try to implement
> this idea, but I am not familiar with the virtio-net, that is a
> pity. :(
>
> -------------------------Simple idea------------------------------
> 
> 1. The packet layout will become as follows:
> 
> +---------------------------------+
> |        Virtio-net header        |
> |(struct virtio_net_hdr_mrg_rxbuf)|
Which fields in virtio_net_hdr_mrg_rxbuf are of interest to vsock?
> +---------------------------------+
> |          Vsock header           |
> |    (struct virtio_vsock_hdr)    |
> +---------------------------------+
> |             payload             |
> |      (until end of packet)      |
> +---------------------------------+
Thanks,
-- 
MST
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
