[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20181116215901.5874-2-saeedm@mellanox.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2018 13:58:50 -0800
From: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>, saeedm@...lanox.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>
Subject: [PATCH mlx5-next 01/12] net/mlx5: EQ, Use the right place to store/read IRQ affinity hint
Currently the cpu affinity hint mask for completion EQs is stored and
read from the wrong place, since reading and storing is done from the
same index, there is no actual issue with that, but internal irq_info
for completion EQs stars at MLX5_EQ_VEC_COMP_BASE offset in irq_info
array, this patch changes the code to use the correct offset to store
and read the IRQ affinity hint.
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c | 2 +-
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/main.c | 14 ++++++++------
include/linux/mlx5/driver.h | 2 +-
3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c
index 1243edbedc9e..2839c30dd3a0 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c
@@ -1760,7 +1760,7 @@ static void mlx5e_close_cq(struct mlx5e_cq *cq)
static int mlx5e_get_cpu(struct mlx5e_priv *priv, int ix)
{
- return cpumask_first(priv->mdev->priv.irq_info[ix].mask);
+ return cpumask_first(priv->mdev->priv.irq_info[ix + MLX5_EQ_VEC_COMP_BASE].mask);
}
static int mlx5e_open_tx_cqs(struct mlx5e_channel *c,
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/main.c
index 28132c7dc05f..d5cea0a36e6a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/main.c
@@ -640,18 +640,19 @@ u64 mlx5_read_internal_timer(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev)
static int mlx5_irq_set_affinity_hint(struct mlx5_core_dev *mdev, int i)
{
struct mlx5_priv *priv = &mdev->priv;
- int irq = pci_irq_vector(mdev->pdev, MLX5_EQ_VEC_COMP_BASE + i);
+ int vecidx = MLX5_EQ_VEC_COMP_BASE + i;
+ int irq = pci_irq_vector(mdev->pdev, vecidx);
- if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&priv->irq_info[i].mask, GFP_KERNEL)) {
+ if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&priv->irq_info[vecidx].mask, GFP_KERNEL)) {
mlx5_core_warn(mdev, "zalloc_cpumask_var failed");
return -ENOMEM;
}
cpumask_set_cpu(cpumask_local_spread(i, priv->numa_node),
- priv->irq_info[i].mask);
+ priv->irq_info[vecidx].mask);
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMP) &&
- irq_set_affinity_hint(irq, priv->irq_info[i].mask))
+ irq_set_affinity_hint(irq, priv->irq_info[vecidx].mask))
mlx5_core_warn(mdev, "irq_set_affinity_hint failed, irq 0x%.4x", irq);
return 0;
@@ -659,11 +660,12 @@ static int mlx5_irq_set_affinity_hint(struct mlx5_core_dev *mdev, int i)
static void mlx5_irq_clear_affinity_hint(struct mlx5_core_dev *mdev, int i)
{
+ int vecidx = MLX5_EQ_VEC_COMP_BASE + i;
struct mlx5_priv *priv = &mdev->priv;
- int irq = pci_irq_vector(mdev->pdev, MLX5_EQ_VEC_COMP_BASE + i);
+ int irq = pci_irq_vector(mdev->pdev, vecidx);
irq_set_affinity_hint(irq, NULL);
- free_cpumask_var(priv->irq_info[i].mask);
+ free_cpumask_var(priv->irq_info[vecidx].mask);
}
static int mlx5_irq_set_affinity_hints(struct mlx5_core_dev *mdev)
diff --git a/include/linux/mlx5/driver.h b/include/linux/mlx5/driver.h
index aa5963b5d38e..7d4ed995b4ce 100644
--- a/include/linux/mlx5/driver.h
+++ b/include/linux/mlx5/driver.h
@@ -1309,7 +1309,7 @@ enum {
static inline const struct cpumask *
mlx5_get_vector_affinity_hint(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev, int vector)
{
- return dev->priv.irq_info[vector].mask;
+ return dev->priv.irq_info[vector + MLX5_EQ_VEC_COMP_BASE].mask;
}
#endif /* MLX5_DRIVER_H */
--
2.19.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists