netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf] bpf: allocate local storage buffers using GFP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181117052010.y3ta6vsdmye7iah5@ast-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date:   Fri, 16 Nov 2018 21:20:11 -0800
From:   Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To:     Roman Gushchin <guroan@...il.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-team@...com, Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>,
        daniel@...earbox.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf] bpf: allocate local storage buffers using GFP_ATOMIC

On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 10:00:34AM -0800, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> Naresh reported an issue with the non-atomic memory allocation of
> cgroup local storage buffers:
> 
> [   73.047526] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at
> /srv/oe/build/tmp-rpb-glibc/work-shared/intel-corei7-64/kernel-source/mm/slab.h:421
> [   73.060915] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 3157, name: test_cgroup_sto
> [   73.068342] INFO: lockdep is turned off.
> [   73.072293] CPU: 2 PID: 3157 Comm: test_cgroup_sto Not tainted
> 4.20.0-rc2-next-20181113 #1
> [   73.080548] Hardware name: Supermicro SYS-5019S-ML/X11SSH-F, BIOS
> 2.0b 07/27/2017
> [   73.088018] Call Trace:
> [   73.090463]  dump_stack+0x70/0xa5
> [   73.093783]  ___might_sleep+0x152/0x240
> [   73.097619]  __might_sleep+0x4a/0x80
> [   73.101191]  __kmalloc_node+0x1cf/0x2f0
> [   73.105031]  ? cgroup_storage_update_elem+0x46/0x90
> [   73.109909]  cgroup_storage_update_elem+0x46/0x90
> 
> cgroup_storage_update_elem() (as well as other update map update
> callbacks) is called with disabled preemption, so GFP_ATOMIC
> allocation should be used: e.g. alloc_htab_elem() in hashtab.c.
> 
> Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
> Tested-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>

applied to bpf tree, thanks