lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 18 Nov 2018 05:53:35 +0000
From:   Y Song <ys114321@...il.com>
To:     lmb@...udflare.com
Cc:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] libbpf: require size hint in bpf_prog_test_run

On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 12:54 PM Lorenz Bauer <lmb@...udflare.com> wrote:
>
> Require size_out to be non-NULL if data_out is given. This prevents
> accidental overwriting of process memory after the output buffer.
>
> Adjust callers of bpf_prog_test_run to this behaviour.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@...udflare.com>
> ---
>  tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c                      |  4 +++-
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c | 10 ++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c
> index 03f9bcc4ef50..127a9aa6170e 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c
> @@ -403,10 +403,12 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run(int prog_fd, int repeat, void *data, __u32 size,
>         attr.test.data_in = ptr_to_u64(data);
>         attr.test.data_out = ptr_to_u64(data_out);
>         attr.test.data_size_in = size;
> +       if (data_out)
> +               attr.test.data_size_out = *size_out;

Maybe it is better to return error (-EINVAL) instead of segfault if
size_out is NULL?
we should try to avoid segfault inside the library. This will change
original API behavior, but
I think it is okay since it is in the user space.

>         attr.test.repeat = repeat;
>
>         ret = sys_bpf(BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN, &attr, sizeof(attr));
> -       if (size_out)
> +       if (data_out)
>                 *size_out = attr.test.data_size_out;
>         if (retval)
>                 *retval = attr.test.retval;
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c
> index 2d3c04f45530..560d7527b86b 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c
> @@ -150,6 +150,7 @@ static void test_xdp(void)
>         bpf_map_update_elem(map_fd, &key4, &value4, 0);
>         bpf_map_update_elem(map_fd, &key6, &value6, 0);
>
> +       size = sizeof(buf);
>         err = bpf_prog_test_run(prog_fd, 1, &pkt_v4, sizeof(pkt_v4),
>                                 buf, &size, &retval, &duration);
>
> @@ -158,6 +159,7 @@ static void test_xdp(void)
>               "err %d errno %d retval %d size %d\n",
>               err, errno, retval, size);
>
> +       size = sizeof(buf);
>         err = bpf_prog_test_run(prog_fd, 1, &pkt_v6, sizeof(pkt_v6),
>                                 buf, &size, &retval, &duration);
>         CHECK(err || retval != XDP_TX || size != 114 ||
> @@ -182,6 +184,7 @@ static void test_xdp_adjust_tail(void)
>                 return;
>         }
>
> +       size = sizeof(buf);
>         err = bpf_prog_test_run(prog_fd, 1, &pkt_v4, sizeof(pkt_v4),
>                                 buf, &size, &retval, &duration);
>
> @@ -189,6 +192,7 @@ static void test_xdp_adjust_tail(void)
>               "ipv4", "err %d errno %d retval %d size %d\n",
>               err, errno, retval, size);
>
> +       size = sizeof(buf);
>         err = bpf_prog_test_run(prog_fd, 1, &pkt_v6, sizeof(pkt_v6),
>                                 buf, &size, &retval, &duration);
>         CHECK(err || retval != XDP_TX || size != 54,
> @@ -252,6 +256,7 @@ static void test_l4lb(const char *file)
>                 goto out;
>         bpf_map_update_elem(map_fd, &real_num, &real_def, 0);
>
> +       size = sizeof(buf);
>         err = bpf_prog_test_run(prog_fd, NUM_ITER, &pkt_v4, sizeof(pkt_v4),
>                                 buf, &size, &retval, &duration);
>         CHECK(err || retval != 7/*TC_ACT_REDIRECT*/ || size != 54 ||
> @@ -259,6 +264,7 @@ static void test_l4lb(const char *file)
>               "err %d errno %d retval %d size %d magic %x\n",
>               err, errno, retval, size, *magic);
>
> +       size = sizeof(buf);
>         err = bpf_prog_test_run(prog_fd, NUM_ITER, &pkt_v6, sizeof(pkt_v6),
>                                 buf, &size, &retval, &duration);
>         CHECK(err || retval != 7/*TC_ACT_REDIRECT*/ || size != 74 ||
> @@ -341,6 +347,7 @@ static void test_xdp_noinline(void)
>                 goto out;
>         bpf_map_update_elem(map_fd, &real_num, &real_def, 0);
>
> +       size = sizeof(buf);
>         err = bpf_prog_test_run(prog_fd, NUM_ITER, &pkt_v4, sizeof(pkt_v4),
>                                 buf, &size, &retval, &duration);
>         CHECK(err || retval != 1 || size != 54 ||
> @@ -348,6 +355,7 @@ static void test_xdp_noinline(void)
>               "err %d errno %d retval %d size %d magic %x\n",
>               err, errno, retval, size, *magic);
>
> +       size = sizeof(buf);
>         err = bpf_prog_test_run(prog_fd, NUM_ITER, &pkt_v6, sizeof(pkt_v6),
>                                 buf, &size, &retval, &duration);
>         CHECK(err || retval != 1 || size != 74 ||
> @@ -1795,6 +1803,7 @@ static void test_queue_stack_map(int type)
>                         pkt_v4.iph.saddr = vals[MAP_SIZE - 1 - i] * 5;
>                 }
>
> +               size = sizeof(buf);
>                 err = bpf_prog_test_run(prog_fd, 1, &pkt_v4, sizeof(pkt_v4),
>                                         buf, &size, &retval, &duration);
>                 if (err || retval || size != sizeof(pkt_v4) ||
> @@ -1808,6 +1817,7 @@ static void test_queue_stack_map(int type)
>               err, errno, retval, size, iph->daddr);
>
>         /* Queue is empty, program should return TC_ACT_SHOT */
> +       size = sizeof(buf);
>         err = bpf_prog_test_run(prog_fd, 1, &pkt_v4, sizeof(pkt_v4),
>                                 buf, &size, &retval, &duration);
>         CHECK(err || retval != 2 /* TC_ACT_SHOT */|| size != sizeof(pkt_v4),
> --
> 2.17.1
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ