[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181118170329.788778a8@bbrezillon>
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2018 17:03:29 +0100
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/25] at24: remove
On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 15:01:08 +0100
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl> wrote:
> As far as merging of this series goes: I'd like to avoid dragging it over
> four releases. The series is logically split into five groups:
>
> patches 1-2: nvmem and mtd changes
> patches 3-9: davinci arch-specific changes
> patches 10-13: networking changes
> patches 14-24: davinci specific again
> patch 25: final at24 change
>
> With that I believe we can do the following: Greg KH could pick up the
> first two patches into his char-misc tree.
The char-misc tree? Why not the MTD or NVMEM tree?
> Sekhar would take the second
> group and the third would go through the networking tree since the first
> three sets are not linked in any way. This would be merged for 4.21. Then
> for the next release Sekhar would pick up 14-24, provide an immutable
> branch for me and I'd merge the final patch for at24 and send it upstream
> through Wolfram's i2c tree (maybe we could even delay the i2c PR in the
> merge window to avoid the immutable branch altogether).
Powered by blists - more mailing lists