netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/4] bpf: account for freed JIT allocations in arch code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKv+Gu8mo+WkJ356wByidUDoA-xHrUH99od5N_yJoqtX_28_5g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 19 Nov 2018 07:37:39 -0800
From:   Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
To:     Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
        Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
        Paul Burton <paul.burton@...s.com>,
        James Hogan <jhogan@...nel.org>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-mips <linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>,
        linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
        "<netdev@...r.kernel.org>" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] bpf: account for freed JIT allocations in arch code

On Mon, 19 Nov 2018 at 02:37, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net> wrote:
>
> On 11/17/2018 07:57 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > Commit ede95a63b5e84 ("bpf: add bpf_jit_limit knob to restrict unpriv
> > allocations") added a call to bpf_jit_uncharge_modmem() to the routine
> > bpf_jit_binary_free() which is called from the __weak bpf_jit_free().
> > This function is overridden by arches, some of which do not call
> > bpf_jit_binary_free() to release the memory, and so the released
> > memory is not accounted for, potentially leading to spurious allocation
> > failures.
> >
> > So replace the direct calls to module_memfree() in the arch code with
> > calls to bpf_jit_binary_free().
>
> Sorry but this patch is completely buggy, and above description on the
> accounting incorrect as well. Looks like this patch was not tested at all.
>

My apologies. I went off into the weeds a bit looking at different
versions for 32-bit and 64-bit on different architectures. So indeed,
this patch should be dropped.

> The below cBPF JITs that use module_memfree() which you replace with
> bpf_jit_binary_free() are using module_alloc() internally to get the JIT
> image buffer ...
>

Indeed. So would you prefer for arm64 to override bpf_jit_free() in
its entirety, and not call bpf_jit_binary_free() but simply call
bpf_jit_uncharge_modmem() and vfree() directly? It's either that, or
we'd have to untangle this a bit, to avoid having one __weak function
on top of the other just so other arches can replace the
module_memfree() call in bpf_jit_binary_free() with vfree() (which
amount to the same thing on arm64 anyway)