[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <A928910C-FA5A-48F8-B3AA-3B8972DC53BF@scaleway.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 18:19:41 +0100
From: Alexis Bauvin <abauvin@...leway.com>
To: David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>, roopa@...ulusnetworks.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, akherbouche@...leway.com,
Alexis Bauvin <abauvin@...leway.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 1/3] udp_tunnel: add config option to bind to a device
Le 19 nov. 2018 à 17:18, David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com> a écrit :
>
> On 11/19/18 7:21 AM, Alexis Bauvin wrote:
>> UDP tunnel sockets are always opened unbound to a specific device. This
>> patch allow the socket to be bound on a custom device, which
>> incidentally makes UDP tunnels VRF-aware if binding to an l3mdev.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexis Bauvin <abauvin@...leway.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Amine Kherbouche <akherbouche@...leway.com>
>> Tested-by: Amine Kherbouche <akherbouche@...leway.com>
>> ---
>> include/net/udp_tunnel.h | 1 +
>> net/ipv4/udp_tunnel.c | 10 ++++++++++
>> net/ipv6/ip6_udp_tunnel.c | 9 +++++++++
>> 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+)
>>
>
> you need to check your command for sending patches. I only received 2 of
> 3 patches and no cover-letter.
>
> I am not seeing any of them in the email account I use for netdev mail.
Sorry for the noise: a configuration error from my side made your email
servers reject my emails without any bounce.
I will re-send the patches.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists