[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <247d4d885b0c04c8c28e54156a7c43b96fe0de10.camel@mellanox.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 18:43:24 +0000
From: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>,
"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH mlx5-next 11/12] {net,IB}/mlx5: Move Page fault EQ and ODP
logic to RDMA
On Sat, 2018-11-17 at 20:13 +0000, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 01:59:00PM -0800, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> > Use the new generic EQ API to move all ODP RDMA data structures and
> > logic
> > form mlx5 core driver into mlx5_ib driver.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>
[...]
> >
> > +struct mlx5_ib_pf_eq {
> > + struct mlx5_ib_dev *dev;
> > + struct mlx5_eq *core;
> > + struct work_struct work;
> > + spinlock_t lock; /* Pagefaults spinlock */
> > + struct workqueue_struct *wq;
> > + mempool_t *pool;
> > +};
>
> I know this is being copied, but can we please not do this vertical
> alignment madness in RDMA? It is such a nightmare to maintain this..
>
Ack will fix and submit v2.
> > +/* mempool_refill() was proposed but unfortunately wasn't accepted
> > + * http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1512.1/05073.html
> > + * Chip workaround.
>
> 'cheap workaround'
>
Will fix
> Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists