netdev - Re: [PATCH mlx5-next 00/10] Collection of ODP fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181119222455.GP3599@mellanox.com>
Date:   Mon, 19 Nov 2018 22:25:02 +0000
From:   Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>
To:     Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>
CC:     Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
        RDMA mailing list <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
        Artemy Kovalyov <artemyko@...lanox.com>,
        Majd Dibbiny <majd@...lanox.com>,
        Moni Shoua <monis@...lanox.com>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
        linux-netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH mlx5-next 00/10] Collection of ODP fixes

On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 01:43:15PM -0700, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 09:10:07PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is collection of fixes to mlx5_core and mlx5_ib ODP logic.
> > There are two main reasons why we decided to forward it to mlx5-next
> > and not to rdma-rc or net like our other fixes.
> >
> > 1. We have large number of patches exactly in that area that are ready
> > for submission and we don't want to create extra merge work for
> > maintainers due to that. Among those future series (already ready and
> > tested): internal change of mlx5_core pagefaults handling, moving ODP
> > code to RDMA, change in EQ mechanism, simplification and moving SRQ QP
> > to RDMA, extra fixes to mlx5_ib ODP and ODP SRQ support.
> >
> > 2. Most of those fixes are for old bugs and there is no rush to fix them
> > right now (in -rc1/-rc2).
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Moni Shoua (10):
> >   net/mlx5: Release resource on error flow
> >   net/mlx5: Add interface to hold and release core resources
> >   net/mlx5: Enumerate page fault types
> >   IB/mlx5: Lock QP during page fault handling
> >   net/mlx5: Return success for PAGE_FAULT_RESUME in internal error state
> >   net/mlx5: Use multi threaded workqueue for page fault handling
> >   IB/mlx5: Improve ODP debugging messages
> 
> Applied to mlx5-next
> b02394aa75e3 IB/mlx5: Improve ODP debugging messages
> 90290db7669b net/mlx5: Use multi threaded workqueue for page fault handling
> ef90c5e9757d net/mlx5: Return success for PAGE_FAULT_RESUME in internal error state
> 032080ab43ac IB/mlx5: Lock QP during page fault handling
> c99fefea2cc9 net/mlx5: Enumerate page fault types
> 27e95603f4df net/mlx5: Add interface to hold and release core resources
> 698114968a22 net/mlx5: Release resource on error flow
> 
> >   IB/mlx5: Avoid hangs due to a missing completion
> >   IB/mlx5: Call PAGE_FAULT_RESUME command asynchronously
> 
> Dropped to address feedback.
> 
> >   net/mlx5: Remove unused function
> 
> Dropped, because it depends on dropped commit.

Okay, merged into for-next

Jason