netdev - Re: consistency for statistics with XDP mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <874lca2kvv.fsf@toke.dk>
Date:   Wed, 21 Nov 2018 22:14:44 +0100
From:   Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...e.dk>
To:     David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
        "netdev\@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Paweł Staszewski <pstaszewski@...are.pl>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
        Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
        "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: consistency for statistics with XDP mode

David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com> writes:

> Paweł ran some more XDP tests yesterday and from it found a couple of
> issues. One is a panic in the mlx5 driver unloading the bpf program
> (mlx5e_xdp_xmit); he will send a send a separate email for that
> problem.

Same as this one, I guess?

https://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=153855905619717&w=2

> The problem I wanted to discuss here is statistics for XDP context. The
> short of it is that we need consistency in the counters across NIC
> drivers and virtual devices. Right now stats are specific to a driver
> with no clear accounting for the packets and bytes handled in XDP.
>
> For example virtio has some stats as device private data extracted via
> ethtool:
> $ ethtool -S eth2 | grep xdp
>     ...
>      rx_queue_3_xdp_packets: 5291
>      rx_queue_3_xdp_tx: 0
>      rx_queue_3_xdp_redirects: 5163
>      rx_queue_3_xdp_drops: 0
>     ...
>      tx_queue_3_xdp_tx: 5163
>      tx_queue_3_xdp_tx_drops: 0
>
> And the standard counters appear to track bytes and packets for Rx, but
> not Tx if the packet is forwarded in XDP.
>
> Similarly, mlx5 has some counters (thanks to Jesper and Toke for helping
> out here):
>
> $ ethtool -S mlx5p1 | grep xdp
>      rx_xdp_drop: 86468350180
>      rx_xdp_redirect: 18860584
>      rx_xdp_tx_xmit: 0
>      rx_xdp_tx_full: 0
>      rx_xdp_tx_err: 0
>      rx_xdp_tx_cqe: 0
>      tx_xdp_xmit: 0
>      tx_xdp_full: 0
>      tx_xdp_err: 0
>      tx_xdp_cqes: 0
>     ...
>      rx3_xdp_drop: 86468350180
>      rx3_xdp_redirect: 18860556
>      rx3_xdp_tx_xmit: 0
>      rx3_xdp_tx_full: 0
>      rx3_xdp_tx_err: 0
>      rx3_xdp_tx_cqes: 0
>     ...
>      tx0_xdp_xmit: 0
>      tx0_xdp_full: 0
>      tx0_xdp_err: 0
>      tx0_xdp_cqes: 0
>     ...
>
> And no accounting in standard stats for packets handled in XDP.
>
> And then if I understand Jesper's data correctly, the i40e driver does
> not have device specific data:
>
> $ ethtool -S i40e1  | grep xdp
> [NOTHING]
>
>
> But rather bumps the standard counters:
>
> sudo ./xdp_rxq_info --dev i40e1 --action XDP_DROP
>
> Running XDP on dev:i40e1 (ifindex:3) action:XDP_DROP options:no_touch
> XDP stats       CPU     pps         issue-pps
> XDP-RX CPU      1       36,156,872  0
> XDP-RX CPU      total   36,156,872
>
> RXQ stats       RXQ:CPU pps         issue-pps
> rx_queue_index    1:1   36,156,878  0
> rx_queue_index    1:sum 36,156,878
>
>
> $ ethtool_stats.pl --dev i40e1
>
> Show adapter(s) (i40e1) statistics (ONLY that changed!)
> Ethtool(i40e1   ) stat:   2711292859 (  2,711,292,859) <= port.rx_bytes /sec
> Ethtool(i40e1   ) stat:      6274204 (      6,274,204) <=
> port.rx_dropped /sec
> Ethtool(i40e1   ) stat:     42363867 (     42,363,867) <=
> port.rx_size_64 /sec
> Ethtool(i40e1   ) stat:     42363950 (     42,363,950) <=
> port.rx_unicast /sec
> Ethtool(i40e1   ) stat:   2165051990 (  2,165,051,990) <= rx-1.bytes /sec
> Ethtool(i40e1   ) stat:     36084200 (     36,084,200) <= rx-1.packets /sec
> Ethtool(i40e1   ) stat:         5385 (          5,385) <= rx_dropped /sec
> Ethtool(i40e1   ) stat:     36089727 (     36,089,727) <= rx_unicast /sec
>
>
> We really need consistency in the counters and at a minimum, users
> should be able to track packet and byte counters for both Rx and Tx
> including XDP.
>
> It seems to me the Rx and Tx packet, byte and dropped counters returned
> for the standard device stats (/proc/net/dev, ip -s li show, ...) should
> include all packets managed by the driver regardless of whether they are
> forwarded / dropped in XDP or go up the Linux stack. This also aligns
> with mlxsw and the stats it shows which are packets handled by the hardware.
>
> From there the private stats can include XDP specifics as desired --
> like the drops and redirects but that those should be add-ons and even
> here some consistency makes life easier for users.
>
> The same standards should be also be applied to virtual devices built on
> top of the ports -- e.g,  vlans. I have an API now that allows bumping
> stats for vlan devices.
>
> Keeping the basic xdp packets in the standard counters allows Paweł, for
> example, to continue to monitor /proc/net/dev.
>
> Can we get agreement on this? And from there, get updates to the mlx5
> and virtio drivers?

I'd say it sounds reasonable to include XDP in the normal traffic
counters, but having the detailed XDP-specific counters is quite useful
as well... So can't we do both (for all drivers)?

-Toke