[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181122162220.GB8353@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 14:22:20 -0200
From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
thomas.lendacky@....com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
ariel.elior@...ium.com, michael.chan@...adcom.com,
santosh@...lsio.com, madalin.bucur@....com,
yisen.zhuang@...wei.com, salil.mehta@...wei.com,
jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com, tariqt@...lanox.com,
saeedm@...lanox.com, jiri@...lanox.com, idosch@...lanox.com,
jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com, peppe.cavallaro@...com,
grygorii.strashko@...com, andrew@...n.ch,
vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com, alexandre.torgue@...com,
joabreu@...opsys.com, linux-net-drivers@...arflare.com,
ganeshgr@...lsio.com, ogerlitz@...lanox.com,
Manish.Chopra@...ium.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next,v3 00/12] add flow_rule infrastructure
On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 03:51:20AM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This patchset is the third iteration [1] [2] [3] to introduce a kernel
> intermediate (IR) to express ACL hardware offloads.
On v2 cover letter you had:
"""
However, cost of this layer is very small, adding 1 million rules via
tc -batch, perf shows:
0.06% tc [kernel.vmlinux] [k] tc_setup_flow_action
"""
The above doesn't include time spent on children calls and I'm worried
about the new allocation done by flow_rule_alloc(), as it can impact
rule insertion rate. I'll run some tests here and report back.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists