| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 10:26:42 +0100
From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@...ux.ibm.com>
To: davem@...emloft.net
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
schwidefsky@...ibm.com, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com,
raspl@...ux.ibm.com, ubraun@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH net-next 09/10] net/smc: add infrastructure to send delete rkey messages
From: Karsten Graul <kgraul@...ux.ibm.com>
Add the infrastructure to send LLC messages of type DELETE RKEY to
unregister a shared memory region at the peer.
Signed-off-by: Karsten Graul <kgraul@...ux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ursula Braun <ubraun@...ux.ibm.com>
---
net/smc/smc_core.h | 3 +++
net/smc/smc_llc.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
net/smc/smc_llc.h | 2 ++
3 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/smc/smc_core.h b/net/smc/smc_core.h
index 07364c0b41a1..bce39d6df45a 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_core.h
+++ b/net/smc/smc_core.h
@@ -109,6 +109,9 @@ struct smc_link {
int llc_testlink_time; /* testlink interval */
struct completion llc_confirm_rkey; /* wait 4 rx of cnf rkey */
int llc_confirm_rkey_rc; /* rc from cnf rkey msg */
+ struct completion llc_delete_rkey; /* wait 4 rx of del rkey */
+ int llc_delete_rkey_rc; /* rc from del rkey msg */
+ struct mutex llc_delete_rkey_mutex; /* serialize usage */
};
/* For now we just allow one parallel link per link group. The SMC protocol
diff --git a/net/smc/smc_llc.c b/net/smc/smc_llc.c
index 132c6a8e49f8..a6d3623d06f4 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_llc.c
+++ b/net/smc/smc_llc.c
@@ -238,6 +238,29 @@ static int smc_llc_send_confirm_rkey(struct smc_link *link,
return rc;
}
+/* send LLC delete rkey request */
+static int smc_llc_send_delete_rkey(struct smc_link *link,
+ struct smc_buf_desc *rmb_desc)
+{
+ struct smc_llc_msg_delete_rkey *rkeyllc;
+ struct smc_wr_tx_pend_priv *pend;
+ struct smc_wr_buf *wr_buf;
+ int rc;
+
+ rc = smc_llc_add_pending_send(link, &wr_buf, &pend);
+ if (rc)
+ return rc;
+ rkeyllc = (struct smc_llc_msg_delete_rkey *)wr_buf;
+ memset(rkeyllc, 0, sizeof(*rkeyllc));
+ rkeyllc->hd.common.type = SMC_LLC_DELETE_RKEY;
+ rkeyllc->hd.length = sizeof(struct smc_llc_msg_delete_rkey);
+ rkeyllc->num_rkeys = 1;
+ rkeyllc->rkey[0] = htonl(rmb_desc->mr_rx[SMC_SINGLE_LINK]->rkey);
+ /* send llc message */
+ rc = smc_wr_tx_send(link, pend);
+ return rc;
+}
+
/* prepare an add link message */
static void smc_llc_prep_add_link(struct smc_llc_msg_add_link *addllc,
struct smc_link *link, u8 mac[], u8 gid[],
@@ -509,7 +532,9 @@ static void smc_llc_rx_delete_rkey(struct smc_link *link,
int i, max;
if (llc->hd.flags & SMC_LLC_FLAG_RESP) {
- /* unused as long as we don't send this type of msg */
+ link->llc_delete_rkey_rc = llc->hd.flags &
+ SMC_LLC_FLAG_RKEY_NEG;
+ complete(&link->llc_delete_rkey);
} else {
max = min_t(u8, llc->num_rkeys, SMC_LLC_DEL_RKEY_MAX);
for (i = 0; i < max; i++) {
@@ -610,6 +635,8 @@ int smc_llc_link_init(struct smc_link *link)
init_completion(&link->llc_add);
init_completion(&link->llc_add_resp);
init_completion(&link->llc_confirm_rkey);
+ init_completion(&link->llc_delete_rkey);
+ mutex_init(&link->llc_delete_rkey_mutex);
init_completion(&link->llc_testlink_resp);
INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&link->llc_testlink_wrk, smc_llc_testlink_work);
return 0;
@@ -650,6 +677,7 @@ int smc_llc_do_confirm_rkey(struct smc_link *link,
{
int rc;
+ /* protected by mutex smc_create_lgr_pending */
reinit_completion(&link->llc_confirm_rkey);
rc = smc_llc_send_confirm_rkey(link, rmb_desc);
if (rc)
@@ -662,6 +690,29 @@ int smc_llc_do_confirm_rkey(struct smc_link *link,
return 0;
}
+/* unregister an rtoken at the remote peer */
+int smc_llc_do_delete_rkey(struct smc_link *link,
+ struct smc_buf_desc *rmb_desc)
+{
+ int rc;
+
+ mutex_lock(&link->llc_delete_rkey_mutex);
+ reinit_completion(&link->llc_delete_rkey);
+ rc = smc_llc_send_delete_rkey(link, rmb_desc);
+ if (rc)
+ goto out;
+ /* receive DELETE RKEY response from server over RoCE fabric */
+ rc = wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout(&link->llc_delete_rkey,
+ SMC_LLC_WAIT_TIME);
+ if (rc <= 0 || link->llc_delete_rkey_rc)
+ rc = -EFAULT;
+ else
+ rc = 0;
+out:
+ mutex_unlock(&link->llc_delete_rkey_mutex);
+ return rc;
+}
+
/***************************** init, exit, misc ******************************/
static struct smc_wr_rx_handler smc_llc_rx_handlers[] = {
diff --git a/net/smc/smc_llc.h b/net/smc/smc_llc.h
index 9e2ff088e301..461c0c3ef76e 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_llc.h
+++ b/net/smc/smc_llc.h
@@ -49,6 +49,8 @@ void smc_llc_link_inactive(struct smc_link *link);
void smc_llc_link_clear(struct smc_link *link);
int smc_llc_do_confirm_rkey(struct smc_link *link,
struct smc_buf_desc *rmb_desc);
+int smc_llc_do_delete_rkey(struct smc_link *link,
+ struct smc_buf_desc *rmb_desc);
int smc_llc_init(void) __init;
#endif /* SMC_LLC_H */
--
2.16.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists