netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: Add BPF_MAP_TYPE_QUEUE and BPF_MAP_TYPE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1dcaef64-16aa-c861-e539-fc8344243363@iogearbox.net>
Date:   Fri, 23 Nov 2018 22:48:14 +0100
From:   Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To:     David Calavera <david.calavera@...il.com>, ecree@...arflare.com
Cc:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: Add BPF_MAP_TYPE_QUEUE and
 BPF_MAP_TYPE_QUEUE to bpftool-map

On 11/23/2018 06:48 PM, David Calavera wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Sorry for the mistake, I'll send a new patch. Before doing that, I've
> noticed that the array of map names in tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c is very
> inconsistent in formatting, some lines use tabs to align the names, others
> use spaces, and other are not aligned at all. Is there any formatting
> convention for this? I can fix those lines if you have a preferred method
> now that I'm adding new elements to that array.

I've fixed the typo from the subject and applied your patch. If you want to
send a patch with white-space cleanup for all the entries that would be fine
with me, sure. You could align all the '=' with tabs to the one from
percpu_cgroup_storage.

Thanks,
Daniel

> On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 2:56 AM Edward Cree <ecree@...arflare.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 22/11/18 20:59, David Calavera wrote:
>>> I noticed that these two new BPF Maps are not defined in bpftool.
>>> This patch defines those two maps and adds their names to the
>>> bpftool-map documentation.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: David Calavera <david.calavera@...il.com>
>>> ---
>> Subject line says 'QUEUE' twice, should one of those be 'STACK'?
>>>  tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-map.rst | 3 ++-
>>>  tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c                         | 2 ++
>>>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-map.rst
>> b/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-map.rst
>>> index f55a2daed59b..9e827e342d9e 100644
>>> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-map.rst
>>> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-map.rst
>>> @@ -42,7 +42,8 @@ MAP COMMANDS
>>>  |            | **percpu_array** | **stack_trace** | **cgroup_array** |
>> **lru_hash**
>>>  |            | **lru_percpu_hash** | **lpm_trie** | **array_of_maps** |
>> **hash_of_maps**
>>>  |            | **devmap** | **sockmap** | **cpumap** | **xskmap** |
>> **sockhash**
>>> -|            | **cgroup_storage** | **reuseport_sockarray** |
>> **percpu_cgroup_storage** }
>>> +|            | **cgroup_storage** | **reuseport_sockarray** |
>> **percpu_cgroup_storage**
>>> +|            | **queue** | **stack** }
>>>
>>>  DESCRIPTION
>>>  ===========
>>> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c
>>> index 7bf38f0e152e..68b656b6edcc 100644
>>> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c
>>> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c
>>> @@ -74,6 +74,8 @@ static const char * const map_type_name[] = {
>>>       [BPF_MAP_TYPE_CGROUP_STORAGE]   = "cgroup_storage",
>>>       [BPF_MAP_TYPE_REUSEPORT_SOCKARRAY] = "reuseport_sockarray",
>>>       [BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_CGROUP_STORAGE]    = "percpu_cgroup_storage",
>>> +     [BPF_MAP_TYPE_QUEUE] = "queue",
>>> +     [BPF_MAP_TYPE_STACK] = "stack",
>>>  };
>>>
>>>  static bool map_is_per_cpu(__u32 type)
>>
>>
>>
>