[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAF=yD-Jz8c2EsoKxUDbf7dygWRW49kwteUsksq3eUV00Eg94-w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2018 23:00:08 -0500
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
To: Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
y2038 Mailman List <y2038@...ts.linaro.org>,
chris@...kel.net, fenghua.yu@...el.com, rth@...ddle.net,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, ubraun@...ux.ibm.com,
linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] socket: Add SO_TIMESTAMPING_NEW
On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 3:58 AM Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Add SO_TIMESTAMPING_NEW variant of socket timestamp options.
> This is the y2038 safe versions of the SO_TIMESTAMPING_OLD
> for all architectures.
>
> Signed-off-by: Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com>
> Cc: chris@...kel.net
> Cc: fenghua.yu@...el.com
> Cc: rth@...ddle.net
> Cc: tglx@...utronix.de
> Cc: ubraun@...ux.ibm.com
> Cc: linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-mips@...ux-mips.org
> Cc: linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org
> Cc: sparclinux@...r.kernel.org
> ---
> /*
> * called from sock_recv_timestamp() if sock_flag(sk, SOCK_RCVTSTAMP)
> * or sock_flag(sk, SOCK_RCVTSTAMPNS)
> @@ -739,8 +740,8 @@ void __sock_recv_timestamp(struct msghdr *msg, struct sock *sk,
> struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
> int need_software_tstamp = sock_flag(sk, SOCK_RCVTSTAMP) || sock_flag(sk, SOCK_RCVTSTAMPNS);
> - struct scm_timestamping tss;
> - int empty = 1, false_tstamp = 0;
> + struct scm_timestamping_internal tss;
> + int empty = 1, false_tstamp = 0, new_tstamp = 0;
> struct skb_shared_hwtstamps *shhwtstamps =
> skb_hwtstamps(skb);
>
> @@ -756,20 +757,23 @@ void __sock_recv_timestamp(struct msghdr *msg, struct sock *sk,
>
> memset(&tss, 0, sizeof(tss));
> if ((sk->sk_tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE) &&
> - ktime_to_timespec_cond(skb->tstamp, tss.ts + 0))
> + ktime_to_timespec64_cond(skb->tstamp, tss.ts + 0))
> empty = 0;
> if (shhwtstamps &&
> (sk->sk_tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RAW_HARDWARE) &&
> !skb_is_swtx_tstamp(skb, false_tstamp) &&
> - ktime_to_timespec_cond(shhwtstamps->hwtstamp, tss.ts + 2)) {
> + ktime_to_timespec64_cond(shhwtstamps->hwtstamp, tss.ts + 2)) {
> empty = 0;
> if ((sk->sk_tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_PKTINFO) &&
> !skb_is_err_queue(skb))
> put_ts_pktinfo(msg, skb);
> }
> if (!empty) {
> - put_cmsg(msg, SOL_SOCKET,
> - SO_TIMESTAMPING_OLD, sizeof(tss), &tss);
> + new_tstamp = sock_flag(sk, SOCK_TSTAMP_NEW);
> + if (new_tstamp)
nit: no need for explicit variable
> + put_cmsg_scm_timestamping64(msg, &tss);
> + else
> + put_cmsg_scm_timestamping(msg, &tss);
>
> if (skb_is_err_queue(skb) && skb->len &&
> SKB_EXT_ERR(skb)->opt_stats)
> --
> 2.17.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists