[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20181125.103152.814206115647404048.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2018 10:31:52 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: bjorn@...k.no
Cc: dsahern@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Can decnet be deprecated?
From: Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2018 12:30:26 +0100
> David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> writes:
>> From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
>> Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2018 17:12:48 -0700
>>
>>> IPX was moved to staging at the end of last year. Can decnet follow
>>> suit? git log seems to indicate no active development in a very long time.
>>
>> Last time I tried to do that someone immediately said on the list
>> "Don't, we're using that!"
>
> Not sure about that. What I can see is a claim that it has no bugs:
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/837484/
>
> The V1 received only support for removal:
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/837261/
>
> But no one claimed they were using decnet.
Ok, if people want to try and deprecate it again we can try.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists