[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <11350ff03fc6b03e34f8b4acd063371c887758d8.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 17:32:19 +0100
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] udp: msg_zerocopy
Hi,
Sorry for the long delay...
On Mon, 2018-11-26 at 10:29 -0500, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> @@ -1109,6 +1128,7 @@ static int __ip_append_data(struct sock *sk,
> error_efault:
> err = -EFAULT;
> error:
> + sock_zerocopy_put_abort(uarg);
> cork->length -= length;
> IP_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), IPSTATS_MIB_OUTDISCARDS);
> refcount_add(wmem_alloc_delta, &sk->sk_wmem_alloc);
Out of sheer ignorance on my side, don't we have a bad reference
accounting if e.g.:
- uarg is attached to multiple skbs, each holding a ref,
- there is a failure on 'getfrag()'
Such failure will release 2 references (1 kfree_skb(), and another in
the above sock_zerocopy_put_abort(), as the count is still positive).
Cheers,
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists