[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b7a635b9-5869-5c36-a276-dc6c896ed527@cumulusnetworks.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 10:54:47 -0700
From: David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>
To: Alexis Bauvin <abauvin@...leway.com>, roopa@...ulusnetworks.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, akherbouche@...leway.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v4 3/5] vxlan: add support for underlay in non-default VRF
On 11/26/18 9:32 AM, Alexis Bauvin wrote:
> Thanks for the review. I’ll send a v5 if you have no other comment on
> this version!
A few comments on the test script; see attached which has the changes.
Mainly the cleanup does not need to be called at the end since you setup
the exit trap. The cleanup calls ip to delete veth-hv-1 and veth-tap but
those are moved to other namespaces. 'ip netns exec NAME ip ...' is more
efficiently done as 'ip -netns NAME ...'. The test results should align
like this:
Checking HV connectivity [ OK ]
Check VM connectivity through VXLAN (underlay in the default VRF) [ OK ]
Check VM connectivity through VXLAN (underlay in a VRF) [ OK ]
So it is easy for users to see the PASS/FAIL.
It would be good to copy the topology ascii art into the test script as
well for future users.
Also, add the test as a separate patch at the end and include it in
tools/testing/selftests/net/Makefile
Finally, I think you should drop the RFC and send it as a 'ready for
inclusion'.
Download attachment "test_vxlan_under_vrf.sh" of type "application/x-sh" (2565 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists