| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <201811261045.VYtat2yg%fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 10:22:41 +0800
From: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
Cc: kbuild-all@...org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] arm64/bpf: don't allocate BPF JIT programs in
module memory
Hi Ard,
I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on arm64/for-next/core]
[also build test WARNING on v4.20-rc4 next-20181123]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Ard-Biesheuvel/bpf-permit-JIT-allocations-to-be-served-outside-the-module-region/20181126-024110
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git for-next/core
config: x86_64-allmodconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-7 (Debian 7.3.0-1) 7.3.0
reproduce:
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
make ARCH=x86_64
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
include/linux/slab.h:332:43: warning: dubious: x & !y
kernel/bpf/core.c:612:6: warning: symbol 'bpf_jit_alloc_exec' was not declared. Should it be static?
>> kernel/bpf/core.c:619:24: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different modifiers)
kernel/bpf/core.c:619:24: expected void *module_region
kernel/bpf/core.c:619:24: got void const *addr
kernel/bpf/core.c:617:13: warning: symbol 'bpf_jit_free_exec' was not declared. Should it be static?
include/linux/slab.h:332:43: warning: dubious: x & !y
kernel/bpf/core.c:1608:9: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces)
kernel/bpf/core.c:1608:9: expected struct callback_head *head
kernel/bpf/core.c:1608:9: got struct callback_head [noderef] <asn:4>*<noident>
include/linux/slab.h:332:43: warning: dubious: x & !y
kernel/bpf/core.c:1682:44: warning: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
kernel/bpf/core.c:1682:44: expected struct bpf_prog_array_item *item
kernel/bpf/core.c:1682:44: got struct bpf_prog_array_item [noderef] <asn:4>*<noident>
kernel/bpf/core.c:1706:26: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces)
kernel/bpf/core.c:1706:26: expected struct bpf_prog_array_item *existing
kernel/bpf/core.c:1706:26: got struct bpf_prog_array_item [noderef] <asn:4>*<noident>
kernel/bpf/core.c:1740:26: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces)
kernel/bpf/core.c:1740:26: expected struct bpf_prog_array_item *[assigned] existing
kernel/bpf/core.c:1740:26: got struct bpf_prog_array_item [noderef] <asn:4>*<noident>
include/trace/events/xdp.h:28:1: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
include/trace/events/xdp.h:53:1: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
include/trace/events/xdp.h:111:1: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
include/trace/events/xdp.h:126:1: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
include/trace/events/xdp.h:161:1: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
include/trace/events/xdp.h:196:1: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
include/trace/events/xdp.h:231:1: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
kernel/bpf/core.c:999:18: warning: Initializer entry defined twice
kernel/bpf/core.c:1001:17: also defined here
kernel/bpf/core.c: In function 'bpf_jit_free_exec':
kernel/bpf/core.c:619:17: warning: passing argument 1 of 'module_memfree' discards 'const' qualifier from pointer target type [-Wdiscarded-qualifiers]
module_memfree(addr);
^~~~
In file included from kernel/bpf/core.c:28:0:
include/linux/moduleloader.h:30:6: note: expected 'void *' but argument is of type 'const void *'
void module_memfree(void *module_region);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
vim +619 kernel/bpf/core.c
ede95a63b Daniel Borkmann 2018-10-23 611
eff59cbcb Ard Biesheuvel 2018-11-23 @612 void *__weak bpf_jit_alloc_exec(unsigned long size)
eff59cbcb Ard Biesheuvel 2018-11-23 613 {
eff59cbcb Ard Biesheuvel 2018-11-23 614 return module_alloc(size);
eff59cbcb Ard Biesheuvel 2018-11-23 615 }
eff59cbcb Ard Biesheuvel 2018-11-23 616
eff59cbcb Ard Biesheuvel 2018-11-23 617 void __weak bpf_jit_free_exec(const void *addr)
eff59cbcb Ard Biesheuvel 2018-11-23 618 {
eff59cbcb Ard Biesheuvel 2018-11-23 @619 module_memfree(addr);
eff59cbcb Ard Biesheuvel 2018-11-23 620 }
eff59cbcb Ard Biesheuvel 2018-11-23 621
:::::: The code at line 619 was first introduced by commit
:::::: eff59cbcb348cb3df3fd41aba28df574c6cf7c27 bpf: add __weak hook for allocating executable memory
:::::: TO: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
:::::: CC: 0day robot <lkp@...el.com>
---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
Download attachment ".config.gz" of type "application/gzip" (66620 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists