lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 26 Nov 2018 17:43:03 -0700
From:   David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To:     "Nambiar, Amritha" <amritha.nambiar@...el.com>,
        stephen@...workplumber.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com, sridhar.samudrala@...el.com,
        jhs@...atatu.com, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, jiri@...nulli.us
Subject: Re: [iproute2-next PATCH v4] tc: flower: Classify packets based port
 ranges

On 11/26/18 5:23 PM, Nambiar, Amritha wrote:
>> Can tc flower use something similar to ip ru with single port or port
>> range handled like this?
>>
>>     },{
>>         "priority": 32764,
>>         "src": "172.16.1.0",
>>         "srclen": 24,
>>         "ipproto": "tcp",
>>         "sport": 1100,
>>         "table": "main"
>>     },{
>>         "priority": 32765,
>>         "src": "172.16.1.0",
>>         "srclen": 24,
>>         "ipproto": "tcp",
>>         "sport_start": 1000,
>>         "sport_end": 1010,
>>         "table": "main"
>>     },{
>>
>>
> 
> Does it have to be separate fields "sport_start" and "sport_end"?
> Removing the space and 'range' keyword will make the output format
> consistent with the input format and print as "sport <number>" for
> single port and "sport <start>-<end>" for range.
> Example:
> 
> ... flower ip_proto tcp src_port 12 skip_hw action will print as:
>   ip_proto tcp
>   src_port 12
>   skip_hw
>   not_in_hw
>         action
> 
> ... flower ip_proto tcp src_port 100-200 skip_hw action :
>   ip_proto tcp
>   src_port 100-200
>   skip_hw
>   not_in_hw
>         action

non-json output needs to match what the user gives on the command line.

My comment was about consistency with json output when possible. I am
not a json expert by any means. Other commands have a single key value
pair, so I suspect the json here needs to follow suit (ie., not
"src_port": "1000-1010" but separate start and end entries).

Powered by blists - more mailing lists