netdev - [PATCH v4 4/4] selftests: add a test for bpf_prog_test_run

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20181128165312.19500-5-lmb@cloudflare.com>
Date:   Wed, 28 Nov 2018 16:53:12 +0000
From:   Lorenz Bauer <lmb@...udflare.com>
To:     ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
        ys114321@...il.com, Lorenz Bauer <lmb@...udflare.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 4/4] selftests: add a test for bpf_prog_test_run_xattr

Make sure that bpf_prog_test_run_xattr returns the correct length
and that the kernel respects the output size hint. Also check
that errno indicates ENOSPC if there is a short output buffer given.

Signed-off-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@...udflare.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c
index c1e688f61061..ee827deb948a 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ static struct {
 	.tcp.urg_ptr = 123,
 };
 
-#define CHECK(condition, tag, format...) ({				\
+#define _CHECK(condition, tag, duration, format...) ({			\
 	int __ret = !!(condition);					\
 	if (__ret) {							\
 		error_cnt++;						\
@@ -83,6 +83,11 @@ static struct {
 	__ret;								\
 })
 
+#define CHECK(condition, tag, format...) \
+	_CHECK(condition, tag, duration, format)
+#define CHECK_ATTR(condition, tag, format...) \
+	_CHECK(condition, tag, tattr.duration, format)
+
 static int bpf_find_map(const char *test, struct bpf_object *obj,
 			const char *name)
 {
@@ -124,6 +129,53 @@ static void test_pkt_access(void)
 	bpf_object__close(obj);
 }
 
+static void test_prog_run_xattr(void)
+{
+	const char *file = "./test_pkt_access.o";
+	struct bpf_object *obj;
+	char buf[10];
+	int err;
+	struct bpf_prog_test_run_attr tattr = {
+		.repeat = 1,
+		.data_in = &pkt_v4,
+		.data_size_in = sizeof(pkt_v4),
+		.data_out = buf,
+		.data_size_out = 5,
+	};
+
+	err = bpf_prog_load(file, BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, &obj,
+			    &tattr.prog_fd);
+	if (CHECK_ATTR(err, "load", "err %d errno %d\n", err, errno))
+		return;
+
+	memset(buf, 0, sizeof(buf));
+
+	err = bpf_prog_test_run_xattr(&tattr);
+	CHECK_ATTR(err != -1 || errno != ENOSPC || tattr.retval, "run",
+	      "err %d errno %d retval %d\n", err, errno, tattr.retval);
+
+	CHECK_ATTR(tattr.data_size_out != sizeof(pkt_v4), "data_size_out",
+	      "incorrect output size, want %lu have %u\n",
+	      sizeof(pkt_v4), tattr.data_size_out);
+
+	CHECK_ATTR(buf[5] != 0, "overflow",
+	      "BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN ignored size hint\n");
+
+	tattr.data_out = NULL;
+	tattr.data_size_out = 0;
+	errno = 0;
+
+	err = bpf_prog_test_run_xattr(&tattr);
+	CHECK_ATTR(err || errno || tattr.retval, "run_no_output",
+	      "err %d errno %d retval %d\n", err, errno, tattr.retval);
+
+	tattr.data_size_out = 1;
+	err = bpf_prog_test_run_xattr(&tattr);
+	CHECK_ATTR(err != -EINVAL, "run_wrong_size_out", "err %d\n", err);
+
+	bpf_object__close(obj);
+}
+
 static void test_xdp(void)
 {
 	struct vip key4 = {.protocol = 6, .family = AF_INET};
@@ -1837,6 +1889,7 @@ int main(void)
 	jit_enabled = is_jit_enabled();
 
 	test_pkt_access();
+	test_prog_run_xattr();
 	test_xdp();
 	test_xdp_adjust_tail();
 	test_l4lb_all();
-- 
2.17.1