[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b8b7bbd2-8f7c-2aef-e9d0-343f8c4c2b2d@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 09:26:27 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] tcp: introduce skb_rbtree_walk_safe() and use it
in tcp_clean_rtx_queue()
On 11/28/2018 08:53 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
>
> On 11/28/2018 06:44 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>>
>
>> Because we can break of the loop if the current skb is not fully acked.
>>
>> So your patch would add unnecessary overhead, since the extra sk_rb_next()
>> could add more extra cache line misses.
>
> I am testing the following optimization, since we can avoid the rb_next() call
> when we reached snd_una
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
> index f32397890b6dcbc34976954c4be142108efa04d8..6829e470f0c186a73c34dca414cd4a2b379baded 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
> @@ -3126,7 +3126,8 @@ static int tcp_clean_rtx_queue(struct sock *sk, u32 prior_fack,
> if (!fully_acked)
> break;
>
> - next = skb_rb_next(skb);
> + next = (scb->end_seq == tp->snd_una) ? NULL : skb_rb_next(skb);
> +
> if (unlikely(skb == tp->retransmit_skb_hint))
> tp->retransmit_skb_hint = NULL;
> if (unlikely(skb == tp->lost_skb_hint))
>
This does not work since we use next skb after the loop :
1) if (!skb)
tcp_chrono_stop(sk, TCP_CHRONO_BUSY);
This test could use tcp_rtx_queue_empty()
2) SACK reneging
if (skb && (TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->sacked & TCPCB_SACKED_ACKED))
flag |= FLAG_SACK_RENEGING;
3) FLAG_SET_XMIT_TIMER
} else if (skb && rtt_update && sack_rtt_us >= 0 &&
sack_rtt_us > tcp_stamp_us_delta(tp->tcp_mstamp,
tcp_skb_timestamp_us(skb))) {
flag |= FLAG_SET_XMIT_TIMER; /* set TLP or RTO timer */
So this idea is not feasible.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists