[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20181127.163917.1798640931979072354.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 16:39:17 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc: fw@...len.de, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] sk_buff: add skb extension infrastructure
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 15:05:02 -0800
> One thing that could be done without too much impact is to provide a cbext[]
> only for TCP packets in write/rtx queue, that is not in sk_buff but
> on the struct sk_buff_fclones
>
> This extra space would not be 0-initialized at alloc_skb()
> and would not be copied at skb_clone()
>
> I mentioned this idea a while back already.
>
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/skbuff.h b/include/linux/skbuff.h
> index 73902acf2b71c8800d81b744a936a7420f33b459..c4bfc2fd98eb9723c0219d5cd8bf5b28afaf5398 100644
> --- a/include/linux/skbuff.h
> +++ b/include/linux/skbuff.h
> @@ -1018,6 +1018,8 @@ struct sk_buff_fclones {
> struct sk_buff skb2;
>
> refcount_t fclone_ref;
> +
> + char cbext[128] __aligned(8);
> };
So, potentially at least, MP-TCP could use this.
The down side is that it doesn't allow for the br_netfilter, skb->sp,
etc. consoldation down to one test.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists