[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 01:10:42 +0000
From: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
CC: "f.fainelli@...il.com" <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH/RFC] net: phy: device: Don't deassert the reset when
register and probe
Hi Andrew,
> From: Andrew Lunn, Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2018 1:44 AM
>
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 12:18:20PM +0000, Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote:
> > Some PHY device needs edge signal of the reset, but the previous code
> > is impossible to achieve it like following:
> >
> > 1) Kernel boots by using initramfs.
> > --> No open the nic, so the provious code deasserts the reset by
> > phy_device_register() and phy_probe().
> > 2) Kernel enters the suspend.
> > --> So, keep the reset signal as deassert.
> > --> On R-Car Salvator-XS board, unfortunately, the board power is
> > turned off.
> > 3) Kernel returns from suspend.
> > 4) ifconfig eth0 up
> > --> Then, since edge signal of the reset doesn't happen,
> > it cannot link up.
>
> Hi Yoshihiro
>
> It sounds like you should be adding code to the suspend/resume
> handling of phylib, so that it toggle the reset on resume. You cannot
> just delete code like you proposed, it is going to break devices. But
> adding code should be O.K.
Thank you for your comment!
I understood we cannot delete the code, but can add the suspend/resume handling
of phylib. I'll make such a patch.
Best regards,
Yoshihiro Shimoda
Powered by blists - more mailing lists