[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <01212b7ece946393c21023a3bde5a4c712ae0293.1543473847.git.lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 14:44:07 +0800
From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
To: network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net,
Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
Subject: [PATCHv2 net] sctp: hold transport before accessing its asoc in sctp_epaddr_lookup_transport
Without holding transport to dereference its asoc, a use after
free panic can be caused in sctp_epaddr_lookup_transport. Note
that a sock lock can't protect these transports that belong to
other socks.
A similar fix as Commit bab1be79a516 ("sctp: hold transport
before accessing its asoc in sctp_transport_get_next") is
needed to hold the transport before accessing its asoc in
sctp_epaddr_lookup_transport.
Note that this extra atomic operation is on the datapath,
but as rhlist keeps the lists to a small size, it won't
see a noticeable performance hurt.
v1->v2:
- improve the changelog.
Fixes: 7fda702f9315 ("sctp: use new rhlist interface on sctp transport rhashtable")
Reported-by: syzbot+aad231d51b1923158444@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
---
net/sctp/input.c | 10 ++++++++--
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/sctp/input.c b/net/sctp/input.c
index 5c36a99..ce7351c 100644
--- a/net/sctp/input.c
+++ b/net/sctp/input.c
@@ -967,9 +967,15 @@ struct sctp_transport *sctp_epaddr_lookup_transport(
list = rhltable_lookup(&sctp_transport_hashtable, &arg,
sctp_hash_params);
- rhl_for_each_entry_rcu(t, tmp, list, node)
- if (ep == t->asoc->ep)
+ rhl_for_each_entry_rcu(t, tmp, list, node) {
+ if (!sctp_transport_hold(t))
+ continue;
+ if (ep == t->asoc->ep) {
+ sctp_transport_put(t);
return t;
+ }
+ sctp_transport_put(t);
+ }
return NULL;
}
--
2.1.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists