netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: allow to configure min tx packet size

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181129002835.GB5037@lunn.ch>
Date:   Thu, 29 Nov 2018 01:28:35 +0100
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: allow to configure min tx
 packet size

On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 04:43:40PM -0600, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
> 
> On 11/28/18 4:02 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> >> This is dynamic configuration related to ALE VLAN entries and
> >> I do not see the way to support its auto-detection with current driver,
> >> unfortunately.
> > 
> > I think you can subscribe to switchdev events which will tell you.
> 
> Thanks a lot for your review and comments.
> 
> Unfortunately, we still do not have switchdev in place, but i need to resolve
> existing issue somehow. This patch is small, local to CPSW fix which can be
> backported to stable. So, if possible, and no strong objection, could we proceed with it?

Hi Grygorii

David is the person who generally says no to kernel module
parameters. You should ask him.

    Andrew