[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181129102703.2huzlalirskjdl4k@kili.mountain>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 13:27:03 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net] bpf: uninitialized variables in test code
Smatch complains that if bpf_test_run() fails with -ENOMEM at the
begining then the "duration" is uninitialized. We then copy the
unintialized variables to the user inside the bpf_test_finish()
function. The functions require CAP_SYS_ADMIN so it's not really an
information leak.
Fixes: 1cf1cae963c2 ("bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
---
net/bpf/test_run.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/bpf/test_run.c b/net/bpf/test_run.c
index c89c22c49015..49304192a031 100644
--- a/net/bpf/test_run.c
+++ b/net/bpf/test_run.c
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_skb(struct bpf_prog *prog, const union bpf_attr *kattr,
bool is_l2 = false, is_direct_pkt_access = false;
u32 size = kattr->test.data_size_in;
u32 repeat = kattr->test.repeat;
- u32 retval, duration;
+ u32 retval, duration = 0;
int hh_len = ETH_HLEN;
struct sk_buff *skb;
struct sock *sk;
@@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_xdp(struct bpf_prog *prog, const union bpf_attr *kattr,
u32 repeat = kattr->test.repeat;
struct netdev_rx_queue *rxqueue;
struct xdp_buff xdp = {};
- u32 retval, duration;
+ u32 retval, duration = 0;
void *data;
int ret;
--
2.11.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists