netdev - Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 06/68] brcmutil: really fix decoding channel info for 160 MHz bandwidth

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 29 Nov 2018 11:54:56 -0500
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     stable@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
        brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@...adcom.com,
        brcm80211-dev-list@...ress.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 06/68] brcmutil: really fix decoding channel
 info for 160 MHz bandwidth

On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 01:49:43PM +0200, Kalle Valo wrote:
>Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org> writes:
>
>> From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>
>>
>> [ Upstream commit 3401d42c7ea2d064d15c66698ff8eb96553179ce ]
>>
>> Previous commit /adding/ support for 160 MHz chanspecs was incomplete.
>> It didn't set bandwidth info and didn't extract control channel info. As
>> the result it was also using uninitialized "sb" var.
>>
>> This change has been tested for two chanspecs found to be reported by
>> some devices/firmwares:
>> 1) 60/160 (0xee32)
>>    Before: chnum:50 control_ch_num:36
>>     After: chnum:50 control_ch_num:60
>> 2) 120/160 (0xed72)
>>    Before: chnum:114 control_ch_num:100
>>     After: chnum:114 control_ch_num:120
>>
>> Fixes: 330994e8e8ec ("brcmfmac: fix for proper support of 160MHz bandwidth")
>> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>
>> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
>
>Please mark your stable patches with:
>
>X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore
>
>This way patchwork ignores them and this saves my time. Thank you.

Will do, thanks!

--
Thanks,
Sasha