netdev - Re: [PATCH 7/8] socket: Add SO_TIMESTAMP[NS]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 30 Nov 2018 14:43:10 -0800
From:   Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com>
To:     willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Network Devel Mailing List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        y2038 Mailman List <y2038@...ts.linaro.org>,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...isc-linux.org>,
        Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>, rth@...ddle.net,
        linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org,
        "open list:RALINK MIPS ARCHITECTURE" <linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>,
        Parisc List <linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux <sparclinux@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] socket: Add SO_TIMESTAMP[NS]_NEW

On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 6:33 AM Willem de Bruijn
<willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 12:28 AM Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > +       if (type == SO_TIMESTAMP_NEW || type == SO_TIMESTAMPNS_NEW)
> > > > > +               sock_set_flag(sk, SOCK_TSTAMP_NEW);
> > > > > +       else
> > > > > +               sock_reset_flag(sk, SOCK_TSTAMP_NEW);
> > > > > +
> > > >
> > > > if adding a boolean whether the socket uses new or old-style
> > > > timestamps, perhaps fail hard if a process tries to set a new-style
> > > > option while an old-style is already set and vice versa. Also include
> > > > SO_TIMESTAMPING_NEW as it toggles the same option.
> >
> > I do not think this is a problem.
> > Consider this example, if there is a user application with updated
> > socket timestamps is linking into a library that is yet to be updated.
>
> Also consider applications that do not use libraries.

Arnd and I talked about this.
We thought that the new options should behave like the already
existing options. The patch already does this.
Eg: Today if we set SO_TIMESTAMP and then try to switch to
SO_TIMESTAMPNS then there is no fail.

Do you still want a hard fail?

-Deepa