lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 30 Nov 2018 18:33:57 -0500
From:   Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
To:     Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        y2038 Mailman List <y2038@...ts.linaro.org>,
        Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, jejb@...isc-linux.org,
        ralf@...ux-mips.org, rth@...ddle.net,
        linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org, linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
        linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
        sparclinux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] sockopt: Rename SO_TIMESTAMP* to SO_TIMESTAMP*_OLD

On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 5:38 PM Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 7:59 PM Willem de Bruijn
> <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 3:58 AM Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > SO_TIMESTAMP, SO_TIMESTAMPNS and SO_TIMESTAMPING options, the
> > > way they are currently defined, are not y2038 safe.
> > > Subsequent patches in the series add new y2038 safe versions
> > > of these options which provide 64 bit timestamps on all
> > > architectures uniformly.
> > > Hence, rename existing options with OLD tag suffixes.
> >
> > Why do the existing interfaces have to be renamed when new interfaces are added?
>
> Existing options need to be renamed because of the macro below:
>
> #define SO_TIMESTAMP (sizeof(time_t) == sizeof(__kernel_long_t) ? \
>             SO_TIMESTAMP_OLD : SO_TIMESTAMP_NEW)
>
> SO_TIMESTAMP is now dependent on size of time_t because of the libc flag.

Yes, I understand the mechanism based on libc's definition of time_t
after Arnd's explanation. Please do capture that in the commit
message, for possible future readers who stumble upon the code with
git blame.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ