[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAF=yD-+DNdGpitd9TABeHjnBFRPcrN4E-AcQNmGMD-Lt9th7mw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 18:33:57 -0500
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
To: Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
y2038 Mailman List <y2038@...ts.linaro.org>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, jejb@...isc-linux.org,
ralf@...ux-mips.org, rth@...ddle.net,
linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org, linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] sockopt: Rename SO_TIMESTAMP* to SO_TIMESTAMP*_OLD
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 5:38 PM Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 7:59 PM Willem de Bruijn
> <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 3:58 AM Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > SO_TIMESTAMP, SO_TIMESTAMPNS and SO_TIMESTAMPING options, the
> > > way they are currently defined, are not y2038 safe.
> > > Subsequent patches in the series add new y2038 safe versions
> > > of these options which provide 64 bit timestamps on all
> > > architectures uniformly.
> > > Hence, rename existing options with OLD tag suffixes.
> >
> > Why do the existing interfaces have to be renamed when new interfaces are added?
>
> Existing options need to be renamed because of the macro below:
>
> #define SO_TIMESTAMP (sizeof(time_t) == sizeof(__kernel_long_t) ? \
> SO_TIMESTAMP_OLD : SO_TIMESTAMP_NEW)
>
> SO_TIMESTAMP is now dependent on size of time_t because of the libc flag.
Yes, I understand the mechanism based on libc's definition of time_t
after Arnd's explanation. Please do capture that in the commit
message, for possible future readers who stumble upon the code with
git blame.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists